Despite
the fact that not a single stadium, other than the Parc des Princes, met the
capacity requirements for hosting World Cup football, the refurbishments
bequeathed upon the stadia France elected to use for the 1998 FIFA World Cup
were modest in comparison to those implemented in Germany before the 2006
tournament, where there were already more than enough stadia capable of housing
the requisite 40,000 spectators. This is not a dig at the Fédération Française de Football but more a pat on the back for the
Deutscher Fußball-Bund.
Or
is it? I was actually quite taken with the renovations on display in 1998: the
two new goalmouth stands at Lyon’s Stade de Gerland, the three banks of
elliptical terracing at Marseille’s Stade Vélodrome, the addition of a disproportionately
large three-tiered stand at Montpellier’s Stade de la Mosson (although I was
disappointed that Strasbourg’s semi-brutalist Stade de la Meinau was not involved).
Nonetheless, the Germans embraced the opportunity to upgrade their stadia, and
the 2006 FIFA World Cup would come to serve as a template for ground building
not just in Europe but across the globe (rendering the new Wembley Stadium,
once it had been completed in 2007, anachronistic by comparison).
Architectural
success is implied but does not necessarily follow. Nuremburg’s Max-Morlock-Stadion,
Hannover’s Niedersachsenstadion, Kaiserslautern’s Fritz-Walter-Stadion and
Schalke’s Veltins-Arena are not pretty stadia. Conversely, Cologne’s RheinEnergieStadion,
Munich’s Allianz Arena, Dortmund’s Westfalenstadion and Berlin’s Olympiastadion
are – or are buildings harmonious in aspect and capable of generating an
atmosphere. Others bid indifference. Enter the Volksparkstadion in Hamburg,
which wasn’t rebuilt in anticipation of World Cup football at all – although it
was known a tender was in the offing – but because the existing structure was
in a bit of a state.
If
cultural stereotypes are your thing, it might be said that the Volksparkstadion is an exercise in Teutonic
efficiency. It is a very simple structure: two continuous tiers with the
corners squared off at angles tracing the shape of a stretched octagon, although
the sides are cambered slightly. The seats are mostly blue and some are red –
mostly notably those in the corners of the upper tier. An area behind one of
the goals is unseated, contributing 10,000 to an overall capacity of 57,000. The
roof consists of a light membrane supported by 40 poles, like a huge circus
tent turned in on itself. Little effort has been made to beautify the functional
exterior: there’s a couple of storeys worth of glass covering the main entrance,
some verdant banking around the steeper sides of the ground, stairwells
shrouded in concrete, and the exposed underside of the second tier and its
supporting framework.
Hamburger
SV attract a large following, so who am I to complain, but unless you live in
Altona, the most westward borough of Hamburg, then a trip to the Volksparkstadion
must seem like quite some journey. Moreover, the ground feels cut off from the rest of the city, with woodland, a cemetery,
an industrial estate and the Barclaycard Arena for company. On top of all that,
the stadium is barely accessible on foot, and those that come by train are
obliged to transfer from the nearest station by shuttlebus. It’s like the Nürburgring
of football, although I suppose this arboreous setting is preferable to the
suburban forms that more normally afflict the peripheries of large cities. Speak
again? The Volksparkstadion does what is expected of it, no more nor less.
If I
lived in Hamburg I’d offer my support to FC St. Pauli. This isn’t only because I
might be able to walk to the Millerntor-Stadion, or that the surroundings are
socially alive and provide amply for pre- and/or post-match beverages, but also
because of the culture the club has embraced: a sort of quasi-socialist,
community-based spirit that values its fans.
It
was not always thus, and one should also bear in mind that the Deutsche Fußball
Liga runs a tighter ship than most. Up until 1998 football clubs were classified
as not-for-profit organisations run by members’ associations, and private
ownership was strictly verboten. Clubs have since been allowed to exist as
private, limited companies, but under the proviso that they retain the majority
of their shares – what’s been termed the 50+1 rule.
In
any case, in and around the 1980s FC St. Pauli began to foment something
approaching a cult, thriving on its reputation as a place for down-and-outs, immigrants, squatters, students,
outsiders. You can make any connections you see fit, but the upshot of all this
was that the denizens of St. Pauli contrived to react against the right-wing
hooliganism that prevailed throughout Europe at the time, campaigning on
progressive issues and fostering inclusivity. Admirable, but for a while it
seemed they might pay a price for being so resolutely out of step. The 1990s
saw the club yo-yoing between Bundesligas 1 and 2, and in 2003 they were relegated
to the Regionalliga Nord, which was at the time the third tier of football in
Germany. Almost bankrupt, the outlook was bleak.
Depending
on who you ask or what you read, the club was saved either by the intervention
of a ‘theatre impresario’ named Corny Littmann or the efforts of the local
community who persuaded the local bars to donate to the club 50 cents from
every bottle of Astra beer sold, in a campaign that became known as ‘drinking
for St. Pauli’. Whatever the reason, the team’s fortunes were revived, and by
2007 they’d been promoted back into the 2
Bundesliga. Perhaps more crucially, that same year FC St. Pauli embarked on
the stalled redevelopment of their ground.
The
South Stand was developed initially, perhaps because it wasn’t much of a stand
in the first place. At a quick glance it still doesn’t look like much: a
single-tiered structure built from terracotta red bricks with a glazed façade,
like the sort of modest office block you might find around the back of your
local high street. But take a closer look. Those bricks form three arched
atriums, the ones to the left and the right set back beneath a glass-fronted gantry
framed in a material the colour of copper carbonate (more than likely aluminium
panels painted pistachio green, perhaps in homage to the metal roofs of the old
warehouses that occupy Hamburg’s Speicherstadt
district). This gantry is actually a corridor providing access to a row of executive
boxes to the rear of the stand – private suites that have been decorated to the
tastes of their individual leaseholders. The middle arch intervenes, rising
above the rest of the ground, displaying the club’s crest and hoisting flags. Darker
brown bricks run horizontally to join with the cladded material that demarcates
the various floors. These same brown bricks alternate with red ones around the
semi-circles of all three arches. The quality of the build appears to be of a
very high standard.
Next
up was the Main Stand, which was to be similar in style to the South except
with two rows of executive boxes stacked on top of each other. Indeed, the two
stands are conjoined. This was not part of the original plan but was insisted
upon to keep the crowd noise from disturbing the residents living diametrically
opposite. Rather than just add to the ground’s capacity, this space has been
set aside as a family area with seats reserved exclusively for children, an
area of decking above for their parents, and rooms behind for entertaining even
younger fry – what’s effectively a kindergarten. As opposed to the South Stand,
which is comprised of seating in the upper tier and standing room in a paddock
beneath, the Main Stand is all-seated, although there is space for wheelchair
users at its base.
Work
began on the Gegengerade (the
‘againststraight’) in January 2012, approximately a year and half after
completion of the Main Stand. An alternate, more elaborate design, dubbed The
Wave, was considered but ultimately rejected on the grounds of cost, the time
required to build it, and its potential incongruity. This was the correct
decision. The Gegengerade is built of the same red
brick and repeats the green cladding around edges of the roof, with plexiglass panels
in between to protect from the elements. The rear of the stadium is mostly
exposed, revealing the underside of the terracing, except at ground level where
there are bars. These bars have been sold on to the local supporters’
association who invite local (graffiti) artists to decorate them prior to the
start of each season. The Gegengerade can hold 13,199; 10,126 spectators in the
paddock and 3,030 seats in the upper tier.
Finally
the North Stand, which looks much as it did prior to redevelopment, only
bigger. Like the Gegengerade it accommodates both seating and standing, as well
as visiting supporters. Despite its simplicity, building it was a bit tricky
due to the public football pitches pressed up behind, but they managed it. The
stand is again finished in red brick, and the same pistachio green fasciae run
around the side and rear edges of the roof. The imposing Flak Tower IV looms in
the middle distance.
Flak Tower IV behind the North Stand
The
seats, where they are present, are a combination of brown, white and red. Along
the walls that demarcate the various paddocks, we have text writ large: VORAN
SANKT PAULI (ahead Saint Pauli) KEIN FUSSBALL DEN FASCHISTEN (no football the
fascists) and KEIN MENSCH IST ILLEGAL (no one is illegal). This really is no
ordinary club, and the Millerntor is far from being an ordinary stadium,
despite its simplistic array. The terracotta red bricks compliment the pistachio
green of those roof fasciae and provide the stadium with a sort of
architectural motif, while the clear plexiglass panels that close off the open
sides of the stands – as well as those that wrap around the rear of the Gegengerade
and North Stand – let in just the right amount of light. Random murals adorn
many of the bricked walls. You wouldn’t know from looking at it that the ground
had been redeveloped in phases over a 10 year period, yet each side of the Millerntor
possesses its own identity, immune to the bland uniformity that so often blights
contemporary stadia.
It
goes to show that stadium architecture needn’t rely on costly gimmicks to make
an impact, nor subscribe to the idea that a ground needs to be completely
demolished and remodelled as a cohesive unit. The physical hinderances and
limited budget have worked to the Millerntor’s advantage and have left St.
Pauli with a stadium that they can be proud of and that still very much feels
like home. British football clubs on a budget would do well to take note.